Language, institution and person
Main Article Content
Abstract
The reflexive effort proposed here is oriented to is aimed at investigating two concepts that make up the core of our constitution as rational beings, that is, as people, we refer to thought and language. What is sought, above all, is to contemplate this link under a somewhat different perspective from those that are usually presented in the literature that circulates through the main bibliographic circuits, those that usually come from psychology, linguistics and, increasingly, from neurosciences. A look is proposed here that emphasizes the link of these concepts with different regions of the conceptual space that we inhabit, which opens reflexive instances that are revealed in their maximum expression when we give ourselves to review or question certain assumed or inherited understandings about said concepts. This journey goes through strong statements, sometimes intentionally careless and free of nuances, which above all seek provocation, open debates, reactions and new productions, before taking care of the style and coverage of all the flanks. He does not resist humor or everyday text, he exposes himself, in short, he tries to open rather than close the conversation. People are complex beings, beings of institutions, of language, we are not bodies nor are we inside them; our limits are not cut in space but, without a doubt, they go beyond our body.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Sophia" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.
Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
Arendt, Hannah. 2003. Eichmann en Jerusalén. Un estudio sobre la banalidad del mal. Barcelona: Lumen.
Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The Claim of Reason. Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality and tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, Donald. 1990. De la verdad y de la interpretación. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Kliemt, Hartmut. 1998. Las instituciones morales. México: Distribuciones Fontamara.
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 2004. Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Cátedra.
Peirce, Charles. 1988. El hombre, un signo. Madrid: Ed. Crítica.
Peirce, Charles. 1931. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (eds.). Harvard University Press.
Van Orman Quine, Willard. 2002. Desde un punto de vista lógico. Barcelona: Paidós.
Ryle, Gilbert. 2005. El concepto de lo mental. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Searle, John. 2006 “¿Qué es una institución?”; Revista de Derecho Político, núm. 66, págs. 89-120.
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1971. Ciencia, percepción y realidad. Barcelona: Ed. Tecnos.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1988. Investigaciones filosóficas. Barcelona: Crítica.