Innovation Climate Scale:psychometric analysis in Peruvian workers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
the changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic pushed organizations to attempt to remain current and competitive. Thus, the ability
to respond to new demands and adapt to shifting conditions was an unavoidable requirement, which implies innovating in the development of
their processes. In that sense, the growing importance of innovative work behaviors in the development of organizations has driven researchers
to investigate mechanisms that foster such behaviors in workers. The objective of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the
Innovation Climate Scale (ICS). The instrumental study involved 273 Peruvian workers (50.916 % male) ranging in age between 22 and 76 years
old (Mean = 45.224), employed for the most part in the private sector (75.092 %). The psychometric analysis explored item clarity and relevance
by means of assessment by expert judges (content validity). Internal structure was assessed via confirmatory factorial analyses, both of oblique
models and bi-factor. Finally, scoring reliability (alpha coefficient) and construct reliability (omega coefficient) were estimated. This study finds
the ICS items to be clear and relevant, a greater empirical support for the unidimensional model as its internal structure, and an adequate relia-
bility. In conclusion there is favorable evidence of validity and reliability for the application of the ICS in Peruvian companies as a useful tool to
measure the innovative climate perceived by its workers, providing information for decision making and planning of innovation strategies and
organizational creativity
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authorship: The list of authors signing must include only those people who have contributed intellectually to the development of the work. Collaboration in the collection of data is not, by itself, a sufficient criterion of authorship. "Retos" declines any responsibility for possible conflicts arising from the authorship of the works that are published.
Copyright: The Salesian Polytechnic University preserves the copyrights of the published articles, and favors and allows their reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Ecuador license. They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of their publication (journal, editorial and work URL) are cited; (Ii) are not used for commercial purposes; Iii) mention the existence and specifications of this license.
References
Afsar, B., & Umrani, W.A, (2019). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 402-428. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2018-0257
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Asociación Médica Mundial. (2017). Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM - Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
Ato, M., López, J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Baltes, B. B., Zhdanova, L. S., & Parker, C. P. (2009). Psychological climate: A comparison of organizational and individual level referents. Human Relations, 62(5), 669–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709103454
Brimhall, K. C. (2019). Are we innovative? Increasing perceptions of nonprofit innovation through leadership, inclusion, and commitment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19857455
Carmona, L. J., Gomes, G., & Costa, D. L. (2020). Elements of organizational culture that encourage innovation development. Revista de Administração FACES Journal, 19(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.21714/1984-6975FACES2020V19N1ART7427
Chan, I. Y., Liu, A. M., & Fellows, R. (2014). Role of leadership in fostering an innovation climate in construction firms. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(6), 06014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000271
Colegio de Psicólogos del Perú. (2018). Código de ética y deontología. Colegio de Psicólogos del Perú. https://www.cpsp.pe/documentos/marco_legal/codigo_de_etica_y_deontologia.pdf
Dhar, R. L. (2015). The effects of high performance human resource practices on service innovative behaviour. International Journal of Hospitality, 51, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.09.002
Dominguez-Lara, S., Romo-González, T., Palmeros-Exsome, C., Barranca-Enríquez, A., del Moral-Trinidad, E., & Campos-Uscanga, Y. (2019). Análisis estructural de la Escala de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff en universitarios mexicanos. Liberabit, 25(2), 267–285. http://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n2.09
Ehrhart, M. G., & Schneider, B. (2016). Organizational climate and culture. En O. Braddick (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia: Psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.3
Ehrhart, M. G., Schneider, B., & Macey, W. H. (2014). Organizational climate and culture. An introduction to theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
Huang, H., & Li, F. (2021). Innovation Climate, knowledge management, and innovative work behaviour in small software companies. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 49(4), e 9780. https://doig.org/10.2224/sbp.9780
Isaksen, S. G. (2023). Assessing the work environment for creativity and innovation: Building on Mathisen and Einarsen’ review (2004). Creativity Research Journal, 35(2), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2112837
Jaiswal, N. K., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity. A multilevel study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.07.002
Jiang, S., Wang, J., Zhang, R., & Liu, O. (2023). Innovation climate for individual motivation and innovation performance: Is innovative behavior a missing link? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), 100440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100440
Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X
Kanter, R. M. (1996). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. En P. S. Myers (Ed.), Knowledge management and organizational design (pp. 93–131). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-9749-1.50010-7
Khalili, A. (2016). Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate. Management Decision, 54(9), 2277–2293. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0196
Kodden, B. (2020). The art of sustainable performance. A model for recruiting, selection, and professional development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46463-9
Liu, F., Chow, I. H-S., Zhang, J. C., & Huang, M. (2019), Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behavior: Exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 13, 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0263-y
Lizarzaburu, E. (2023). Evolución y perspectivas del e-commerce para el comercio minorista en el Perú (2022). Universidad de Lima, Facultad de Comunicación, Carrera de Comunicación. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/17905
Merino-Soto, C., & Livia-Segovia, J. (2009). Intervalos de confianza asimétricos para el índice la validez de contenido: Un programa Visual Basic para la V de Aiken. Anales de Psicología, 25(1), 169–171. https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/71631
Mumford, M. D., Fichtel, M., England, S., & Newbold, T. R. (2023). Leader thinking, follower thinking: Leader impacts on follower creative performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-045553
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Newman, A., Round, H., Wang, S., & Mount, M. (2020). Innovative climate: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 73–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12283
Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., Robinson, D. L., & Wallace, A. M. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.312
Pichlak, M. (2016). The innovation adoption process: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(4), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.52
Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
Sánchez-Villena, A. R., Dominguez-Lara, S., Aranda, M., Fuentes Gutiérrez, V., & García-Domingo, M. (2021). Análisis estructural de la Escala de Dependencia y Adicción al Smartphone (EDAS) en universitarios peruanos. Health and Addictions, 21(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.21134/haaj.v21i2.572
Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051808324100
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., van der Heijden, B., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004
Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(5), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.553
Suárez-Alvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L.M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.33
Usmanova, K., Wang, D., & Sumarliah, E. (2023). Spiritual leadership a pathwaytoward innovative work behavior via knowledge sharing self-efficacy: moderating role of innovation climate. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(6), 1250-1270. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2021-0054
West, M. A., & Sacramento, C. A. (2012). Creativity and innovation: The role of team and organizational climate. En M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 359–385). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00015-X
Ye, P., Liu, L., & Tan, J. (2022). Creative leadership, innovate climate behaviour: The moderating role of knowledge sharing in management. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1092–1114. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0199